<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>시리얼의 따뜻한 코코아 한잔: Serials-Last-Theorem에 달린 최근 댓글/트랙백 목록</title>
		<link>http://serialx.net/</link>
		<description>세상을 바라보는 또다른 한 사람의 관점</description>
		<language>ko</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:24:07 +0900</pubDate>
		<generator>Textcube 1.7.6 : Staccato</generator>
		
		<item>
			<title>그네고치기님의 댓글</title>
			<link>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment176</link>
			<description>Reviewer&#039;s note : in case of [Son-of-a-friend-of-mother&#039;s], such statement &amp;quot;H(1) is trivial, thus always true&amp;quot; is not true.</description>
			<author>(그네고치기)</author>
			<guid>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment176</guid>
			<comments>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:05:38 +0900</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>serialx님의 댓글</title>
			<link>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment177</link>
			<description>It is true because theres no counter example to it. :P</description>
			<author>(serialx)</author>
			<guid>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment177</guid>
			<comments>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:08:40 +0900</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cmijoa님의 댓글</title>
			<link>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment178</link>
			<description>I find a counterexample about your theorem.
But, I don&#039;t write because I&#039;m tired. -_-;;</description>
			<author>(cmijoa)</author>
			<guid>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment178</guid>
			<comments>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:09:55 +0900</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>요한님의 댓글</title>
			<link>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment179</link>
			<description>Unfortunely, Your theorem is true T^T</description>
			<author>(요한)</author>
			<guid>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment179</guid>
			<comments>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:34:04 +0900</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>netj님의 댓글</title>
			<link>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment180</link>
			<description>A classical/non-intuitionistical proof)
By definition, Software Engineering is a job for not doing the job.
Thus, nothing gets done by SE.
Q.E.D.</description>
			<author>(netj)</author>
			<guid>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment180</guid>
			<comments>http://serialx.net/entry/Serials-Last-Theorem#comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:02:47 +0900</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
